• Home
    • ›

    Reasonably priced acoustic.

    JockoJocko Posts: 7,078Member, Moderator
    in Guitar Chat
    My wife's grandson is wanting a quality acoustic, and has started saving up for one. He would love a Taylor, but realises that would take too long to save for on pocket money. What would you guys recommend he look at?
    · Share on Twitter

    Comments

    • Screaming DaveScreaming Dave Posts: 781Member
      I've always rated both Yamaha and Washburn's low end acoustics
      · Share on Twitter
    • ESBlondeESBlonde Posts: 941Member
      Sigma have a good reputaion for almost copies. They were owned by C F Martin for a while and their Martinesq guitars are very good (not just for the price).
      · Share on Twitter
    • Kevin PeatKevin Peat Posts: 3,183Member
      edited July 8
      Vintage V300MH - an utter steal at £170 and winner of best guitar under £1000 one year by The Guitar Magazine.

      It has certainly cured my GAS.
      · Share on Twitter
    • JockoJocko Posts: 7,078Member, Moderator
      I suggested Vintage, going on your previous recommendations. I'll push him in that direction.
      · Share on Twitter
    • nicholaspaulnicholaspaul Posts: 961Member
      edited July 11
      The naked Faith models sound amazing. Not as cheap as Vintage though, but still great value for money at around £300.
      Has anyone here tried Harley Benton acoustics? Their electrics have such great reviews, I’m curious how their other lines measure up.

      Eating fewer vegetables cured my GAS.
      · Share on Twitter
    • JockoJocko Posts: 7,078Member, Moderator
      I tried naked Faith when I was looking to buy my Larrivée, and was suitably impressed. A lot of guitar for the money.
      · Share on Twitter
    • Pete_BPete_B Posts: 562Member
      I would always go Yamaha, purely for the quality, but I do like Faith.
      There is no Mojo!
      · Share on Twitter
    • Kevin PeatKevin Peat Posts: 3,183Member
      edited August 14
      True. The build and QC is unsurpassed at Yamaha. I find, however, there is a mysterious quality called Mojo which is why I wouldn't go for Yamaha. I find them quite generic and there is nothing wrong with that. They are very precise and competent guitars but lack something characterful that is now affordable in their price range that wasn't in the '80s when I bought one. They were the best affordable guitar... then, a bit like Ovation were too.

      I've never played a £1000 plus Yamaha to compare.
      · Share on Twitter
    • Pete_BPete_B Posts: 562Member
      Kevin Peat said:

      They are very precise and competent guitars but lack something characterful that is now affordable in their price range

      I've never played a £1000 plus Yamaha to compare.

      That price range varies from £120 to £6700
      There is no Mojo!
      · Share on Twitter
    • Kevin PeatKevin Peat Posts: 3,183Member
      The reasonably priced Yamaha acoustics are what would be found in school music departments alongside the Pacificas. A sensible choice, I agree.
      · Share on Twitter
    • Kevin PeatKevin Peat Posts: 3,183Member
      I'm keen to have a look at one of those ARE treated Yamahas to see if what they say is true about artificial wood ageing. Not available in the lower price range though.
      · Share on Twitter
    • Pete_BPete_B Posts: 562Member
      edited August 17
      A few makers seem to be doing it nowdays including Atkin, ok not on topic of reasonably priced but sounds good
      There is no Mojo!
      · Share on Twitter
    • Kevin PeatKevin Peat Posts: 3,183Member
      Wow ! Now those have mojo ! They really do sound old.
      · Share on Twitter
    Sign In or Register to comment.